Regan v. Capital Management Services, LP
Plaintiff: Kristin Regan
Defendant: Capital Management Services, LP
Case Number: 1:2018cv01412
Filed: March 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Edward R. Korman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital Management Services, LP filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10256267 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Kristin Regan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit) (Cohen, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regan v. Capital Management Services, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristin Regan
Represented By: Daniel C Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital Management Services, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?