Ferguson v. Slade Industries, Inc.
| Shaandj Ferguson |
| Slade Industries, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02196 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Robert M Levy |
| Allyne R Ross |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin M. Vogel on behalf of Slade Industries, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Vogel, Justin) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Slade Industries, Inc.. (Schultz, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Slade Industries, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Schindler Enterprises, Inc. for Slade Industries, Inc.. (Schultz, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Slade Industries, Inc. from Queens County Supreme Court, case number 702827/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10353958) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, Plaintiff's Summons and Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, Defendant's Proposed Answer to Verified Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #5 Notice to Adverse Party of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Schultz, Matthew) |
| Case assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferguson v. Slade Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Slade Industries, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Scott Schultz |
| Represented By: | Justin M. Vogel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shaandj Ferguson | |
| Represented By: | Michael Roitman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
