Wu v. Nielsen et al
| Siyuan Wu |
| Gregory A. Richardson, Jeff B. Sessions, III, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen M. Nielsen and Director of F.B.I. Christopher A. Wray |
| 1:2018cv02787 |
| May 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Gregory A. Richardson, Jeff B. Sessions, III, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet by Siyuan Wu (Rahman, Meer) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Siyuan Wu (Rahman, Meer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Wu against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Siyuan Wu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Rahman, Meer) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
