Craine v. Cox Media Group, LLC
| Nicole Craine |
| Cox Media Group, LLC |
| 1:2018cv02908 |
| May 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Raymond J Dearie |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Dismissal) (Rocco, Christine) |
Filing 11
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(I)(A)(i) of the Federal Rues of Civil Procedure, by and through her undersigned counsel, Plaintiff Nicole Craine hereby give notice that the above action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to either party. SO Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 7/9/2018. (Ramesar, Thameera)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and adjournment of Conference by Cox Media Group, LLC. (Potter, Robert) MOTION to Adjourn Conference Modified on 7/2/2018 (Vertus, Miriam). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nicole Craine With Prejudice (Dunne, Joseph) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Adjourn 7/5/2018 Initial Conference as well as the deadlines for submission of the Case Management Statement and Answer the Complaint are cancelled as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 7/2/2018. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to 7/3/2018. Initial Conference is set for 7/5/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., located in the United States Eastern District of New York Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. All counsel are required to attend. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Prior to the conference, the parties are to comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (See attached blank document). Case Management Statement must be completed and filed on ECF no later than 7/3/2018.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 6/13/2018. (Genovese, Jacqueline)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Cox Media Group, LLC. (Potter, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Nathan Potter on behalf of Cox Media Group, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Potter, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cox Media Group, LLC. (Williams, Erica) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Raymond J. Dearie and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) Modified on 5/17/2018 (Williams, Erica). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cox Media Group, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10437169 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Nicole Craine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons as to Cox Media Group, LLC) (Dunne, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Craine v. Cox Media Group, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cox Media Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert Nathan Potter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Craine | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Dunne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
