TRUSHELEV et al v. City of New York et al
| BRIAN TRUSHELEV and PAVEL PORADISOV |
| NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVES JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE #S 1-10, FIRST AND LAST NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND CURRENTLY UNKNOWN, CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE OFFICER ROBERT RAMIREZ, badge/shield number 20138, City of New York, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE #S 1-10, FIRST AND LAST NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS and New York City Police Department |
| 1:2018cv03239 |
| June 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Sterling Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT against CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE OFFICER ROBERT RAMIREZ, badge/shield number 20138, City of New York, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE #S 1-10, FIRST AND LAST NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVES JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE #S 1-10, FIRST AND LAST NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND CURRENTLY UNKNOWN, New York City Police Department filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10478099 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by BRIAN TRUSHELEV, PAVEL PORADISOV. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bennett, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
