Carbajal et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
| Shaulat Ali Chaudhry, Rashad Rasheed, Juan Jose Castelanos, Jasbir Baddhan, Dalia Wilcenski, Alexander Torres, Ulises Enrique Santos Lopez, Emad Shahid Quraishi, Muhammad Qamar UL Zaman, Wilfido Vasques Valdez, Arif Mehmood, Vrajesh Patel, Nisar Chaudhry, Muhammad Khalid Nazir, Imran Saeed, Muneer Haleem, Benigna Carbajal, Maria Lourdes Lopez Torres, Lubna Quamar and Khalid Mahmood |
| 7-Eleven, Inc. and Choe Yong Min |
| 1:2018cv03273 |
| June 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 7-Eleven, Inc., Choe Yong Min filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10482922 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Maria Lourdes Lopez Torres, Rashad Rasheed, Emad Shahid Quraishi, Shaulat Ali Chaudhry, Benigna Carbajal, Vrajesh Patel, Alexander Torres, Nisar Chaudhry, Ulises Enrique Santos Lopez, Muneer Haleem, Arif Mehmood, Juan Jose Castelanos, Muhammad Qamar UL Zaman, Wilfido Vasques Valdez, Lubna Quamar, Muhammad Khalid Nazir, Dalia Wilcenski, Jasbir Baddhan, Imran Saeed, Khalid Mahmood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Request for Summons) (Taubenfeld, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
