Taylor v. The City of New York et al
| Albert Taylor |
| Annette Eastman, Martha Barnes, Administration For Children's Services, Andrea Murphy, Tennille Defrietas, The City of New York, Karen McNeely, Ingrid Wilkens, Tracey Ulcena, Vivian Grant, Sherri Wright, David Hansell, Tyra Smith, Lisa Harris and Dina Barkin |
| 1:2018cv03759 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| William F Kuntz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to the City of New York; Administration For Children's Services; Ingrid Wilkens, Child Protective Specialist; Sherri Wright, Child Protective Specialist; Dina Barkin, Child Facilitator Specialist; Tyra Smith, Manager; Annette Eastman, Deputy Director; David Hansell, Commissioner; Tracey Ulcena, Child Protective Specialist / Supervisor; Tennille Defrietas, Child Protective Specialist; Martha Barnes, Child Protective Specialist; Andrea Murphy, Supervisor; Karen McNeely, Manager; Vivian Grant, Deputy Director; and Lisa Harris, Police Officer. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's Orders and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the Office of the Corporation Counsel via first class mail.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 was granted on 6/29/2018. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summonses and complaint upon the named defendants without prepayment of fees. The parties shall advise the Court by signing the enclosed form whether they jointly consent to trial and decision on this case by me, a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 7/30/2018. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, #2 Consent to Magistrate Judge Trial. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
|
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 6/29/2018. (Kuntz, William)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Albert Taylor. (Williams, Erica) Modified on 6/29/2018 (Williams, Erica). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Administration For Children's Services, Dina Barkin, Martha Barnes, Tennille Defrietas, Annette Eastman, Vivian Grant, David Hansell, Lisa Harris, Karen McNeely, Andrea Murphy, Tyra Smith, The City of New York, Tracey Ulcena, Ingrid Wilkens, Sherri Wright, filed by Albert Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
