Gonzalez Lopez v. First Response Cleaning Corp. et al
| Ludwing Arnoldo Gonzalez Lopez |
| First Response Cleaning Corp., Carl Walsh, Charlotte Walsh, First Response Cleaning Corp. doing business as First Response and Charlotte Marchese |
| 1:2018cv03810 |
| June 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| James Orenstein |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Response Cleaning Corp., Carl Walsh, Charlotte Walsh filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10552837 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Ludwing Arnoldo Gonzalez Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons First Response Cleaning Corp., #3 Proposed Summons Charlotte Walsh (a.k.a. Charlotte Marchese), #4 Proposed Summons Carl Walsh) (Faillace, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
