Hashad v. Bay & Bath Market Inc. et al
Rowan Hashad |
John Munayirji, Emad Melek and Bay & Bath Market Inc. |
1:2018cv03819 |
July 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
William F Kuntz |
Ramon E Reyes |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bay & Bath Market Inc., Emad Melek, John Munayirji. (Attachments: #1 Summons2, #2 Summons3) (Williams, Erica) |
Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Rowan Hashad (De Toffol, David) |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Rowan Hashad as to John Munayirji. (De Toffol, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Rowan Hashad as to Emad Melek. (De Toffol, David) |
Filing 2 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Rowan Hashad as to Bay & Bath Market Inc.. (De Toffol, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bay & Bath Market Inc., Emad Melek, John Munayirji filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10554097 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Rowan Hashad. (De Toffol, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.