Choudhury v. Equifax et al
| Mubin Choudhury |
| WEBBANK, Fingerhut a/k/a Bluestem Brands, Equifax, TransUnion, Experian, Fingerhut and Bluestem Brands |
| 1:2018cv04017 |
| July 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TransUnion identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by TransUnion (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TransUnion from Civil Court of City Of New York, County of Queens, case number 019772/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10579334) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint To Trans Union, LLC) (Nicodemus, Camille) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
