McGriff v. City of New York Police Department et al
| Luquana McGriff |
| City of New York Police Department and Richard Napolitano |
| 1:2018cv04128 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| William F Kuntz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the complaint, filed in forma pauperis , is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated July 30, 2018; that Defendant NYPD's motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice is denied; that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 10/23/2018. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 12
ORDER: The complaint, filed in forma pauperis , is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated July 30, 2018. Defendant NYPD's motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States , 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 10/18/2018. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
|
ORDER: The motion requesting to adjourn conference #11 is granted. The in-person initial conference scheduled for 10/12/2018 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara is adjourned sine die. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/3/2018. (Silberstein, Hope)
|
| Filing 11 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference on October 12, 2018 by City of New York Police Department. (Turetsky, Samantha) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by City of New York Police Department. (Turetsky, Samantha) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Paige Turetsky on behalf of City of New York Police Department (aty to be noticed) (Turetsky, Samantha) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in person initial conference will be held at 10:00 A.M. on October 12, 2018 in Courtroom 324N of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. A request for an adjournment must be received in writing at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/21/2018. (Manson, Eddie)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Luquana McGriff. Richard Napolitano, Chief - served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Luquana McGriff. City of New York Police Department served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the entry of this Memorandum and Order. In the amended complaint, Plaintiff should provide facts to support a plausible claim that defendant NYPD violated Title VII and the ADA. All further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed or show good cause why she cannot comply, the complaint shall be dismissed for the reasons set forth herein. If submitted, the amended complaint will be reviewed for compliance with this Memorandum and Order and for sufficiency under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 7/30/2018. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to the City of New York Police Department; and Richard Napolitano. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 7/25/2018 Electronic Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the Office of the Corporation Counsel via first class mail.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
|
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on. 7/25/2018. (Kuntz, William)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luquana McGriff. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York Police Department, Richard Napolitano, filed by Luquana McGriff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
