M.K. et al v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
| Lori Ann Kowalski, M K and M.K. |
| American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv04138 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M Gold |
| William F Kuntz |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry: Initial Conference Hearing held on 9/6/2018 before Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Hough for plaintiffs, Chan for defendants. Fact discovery will be completed by January 15, 2019. Plaintiffs' expert reports will be served by February 15, 2019, and defendants' expert reports will be served by March 15, 2019. Plaintiffs will submit a letter by September 27 explaining the legal basis for the claims asserted by Lori Kowalski (i.e., either providing authority indicated that a parent may recover for observing an infant child's distress, or explaining an alternative theory underlying Kowalski's claim). THE COURT WILL HOLD A FURTHER CONFERENCE AT 10:00 a.m. ON MARCH 21, 2019. LEAD COUNSEL OF RECORD MUST ATTEND. The parties shall be prepared (1) to state their respective positions on settlement, with PRINCIPALS WITH FULL SETTLEMENT DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY (UP TO THE AMOUNT LAST DEMANDED FOR DEFENDANTS, DOWN TO THE AMOUNT LAST OFFERED FOR PLAINTIFFS) PRESENT OR AVAILABLE BY TELEPHONE THROUGHOUT THE CONFERENCE, (2) to schedule any anticipated depositions of experts, (3) to articulate the basis for any anticipated summary judgment motions and to be familiar with any premotion conference procedures required by the district judge presiding over the case, and (4) to state whether they will agree to assignment of this case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including jury trial and entry of final judgment. Counsel are encouraged to file a written application requesting a settlement conference on an earlier date if they believe it might be productive to do so. (Gillespie, Saudia) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Jean-Jacques on behalf of Lori Ann Kowalski, M.K. (aty to be noticed) (Jean-Jacques, Michelle) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 10:00 a.m. on September 6, 2018 before the undersigned in Courtroom 13-D South. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiffs are directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendants' counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 7/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Chambers Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc. re #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Notice of Removal,,,, (Chan, Alice) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, by American Airlines, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc. (Chan, Alice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants American Airlines, Inc. and American Eagle Airlines, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10596969) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiffs Affidavit of Service - American Airlines, Inc., #3 Exhibit C - CT Corp. Transmittal - American Airlines, Inc., #4 Exhibit D - American Airlines, Inc.'s Verified Answer, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiffs' Affid. of Svc on American Eagle Airlines, Inc., #6 Exhibit F - CT Corp Transmittal on American Eagle Airlines, Inc., #7 Exhibit G - American Eagle Airlines, Inc.'s Verified Answer, #8 Exhibit H - CT Corp Transmittal - Envoy Air Inc., #9 Exhibit I - Envoy Air Inc. Verified Answer, #10 Exhibit J - Plaintiffs' Resp. to Demand Pursuant to CPLR 3017(c), #11 Exhibit K - Notice of Motion to Compel/Aff. in Support, #12 Exhibit L - Plaintiffs' Aff. in Opp. to Defendants' Motion to Compel, #13 Exhibit M - Preliminary Conference Order Dated 4/18/2018, #14 Exhibit N - Plaintiffs' Verified Bill of Particulars, #15 Exhibit O - Plaintiffs' Response to Preliminary Conference Order) (Chan, Alice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
