Scuorzo et al v. Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kiyan Nourain and Vincent Scuorzo
Defendant: Irene Chivily Von Toussaint, Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation and Chris Capobianco
Case Number: 1:2018cv04287
Filed: July 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: William F Kuntz
Referring Judge: Robert M Levy
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 12/6/2018 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 11B South before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 9/24/2018. (Marino, Janine)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RE #9 MOTION for an Extension of Time until 10/17/18 to Answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Application granted, on consent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 9/24/2018. (Marino, Janine)
September 20, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION (motion) for an Extension of Time to Answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Modified, changed to motion on 9/24/2018 (Marino, Janine).
September 19, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Samuel Hershberg on behalf of Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation, Chris Capobianco, Irene Chivily Von Toussaint (aty to be noticed) (Hershberg, Jonathan)
September 19, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Laurent Scott Drogin on behalf of Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation, Chris Capobianco, Irene Chivily Von Toussaint (aty to be noticed) (Drogin, Laurent)
July 30, 2018 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica)
July 30, 2018 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica)
July 29, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation, Chris Capobianco, Irene Chivily Von Toussaint. (Williams, Erica)
July 29, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica)
July 29, 2018 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Kiyan Nourain, Vincent Scuorzo (El-Hag, Jordan)
July 29, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Kiyan Nourain, Vincent Scuorzo (El-Hag, Jordan)
July 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation, Chris Capobianco, Irene Chivily Von Toussaint filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10617355 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Vincent Scuorzo, Kiyan Nourain. (El-Hag, Jordan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scuorzo et al v. Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Irene Chivily Von Toussaint
Represented By: Laurent Scott Drogin
Represented By: Jonathan Samuel Hershberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridge the Gap Solutions Corporation
Represented By: Laurent Scott Drogin
Represented By: Jonathan Samuel Hershberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Capobianco
Represented By: Laurent Scott Drogin
Represented By: Jonathan Samuel Hershberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kiyan Nourain
Represented By: Jordan Alexander El-Hag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vincent Scuorzo
Represented By: Jordan Alexander El-Hag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?