Proarch Design Solutions, LLC v. Lazercad Inc. et al
| Proarch Design Solutions, LLC |
| M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc., Michael Axon, Lazercad Inc., Capital One Financial Corp., 360 Design Studio LLC and Jones Lang Lasalle, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv04542 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER re #13 Stipulation filed by M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. -- The stipulation is undated. Counsel shall refile a signed and dated stipulation no later than October 12, 2018. So Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/5/2018. (Carosella, Christy)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Voluntary Discontinuance by M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. (Sacket, Lee) |
|
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to answer #12 is granted. Defendant M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. has until 10/8/2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/10/2018. (Zhang, Fan)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.. (Sacket, Lee) |
|
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to answer #11 is granted. Defendant Jones Lang Lasalle, Inc. has until October 12, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/6/2018. (Zhang, Fan)
|
|
ORDER: The motion to adjourn conference #10 is granted. The initial conference is hereby rescheduled for 10/19/2018 at 3:30 PM in Courtroom 324N before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/6/2018. (Zhang, Fan)
|
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Jones Lang Lasalle, Inc.. (Lichtenberg, Barry) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference scheduled for 9-20-18 by Proarch Design Solutions, LLC. (Rubinstein, H.) |
|
Order Dismissing Party 360 Design Studio LLC per #9 . So Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/5/2018. (Carosella, Christy)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Proarch Design Solutions, LLC as to defendant 360 Design Only (Rubinstein, H.) |
|
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to answer #8 is granted. Defendant Capital One Financial Corp. has until 10/12/2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/4/2018. (Zhang, Fan)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Capital One Financial Corp.. (Lubertazzi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in person initial conference will be held on 9/20/2018 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 324N before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 9/20/2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/16/2018. (Manson, Eddie)
|
|
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to answer #6 is granted. Defendants have until September 17, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/16/2018. (Zhang, Fan)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Jones Lang Lasalle, Inc.. (Lichtenberg, Barry) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Of Service by Proarch Design Solutions, LLC (Rubinstein, H.) |
| Email Notification Test for McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP - DO NOT REPLY |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Capital One Financial Corp.. (Lubertazzi, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Capital One Financial Corp. from Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, case number 513957/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10650081) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service - Capital One, #3 Exhibit C - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavits(3) of service, #5 Exhibit E - Consent, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lubertazzi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
