Johnson v. State Attorney General et al
| Elizabeth Johnson |
| Michael McMahon, Karen Wolffe, ACS Department, State Attorney General, Williams E. Garnette and Probation Department |
| 1:2018cv04585 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's #9 request for pro bono counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is hereby reminded that, pursuant to Judge Cogan's #8 Order dated 9/14/2018, she must file her amended complaint by 10/22/2018. The Court encourages plaintiff to make an appointment as soon as possible with the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project which provides limited representation to pro se litigants in this district. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 10/4/2018. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project flyer. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Elizabeth Johnson. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER dated 9/14/18 granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File amended complaint. Granted to 10/22/18. However, this is a lengthy extension and plaintiff should not expect to receive further extension. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/14/2018 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of address by Elizabeth Johnson, plaintiff pro se. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File requesting until 10/22/18 to file Amended Complaint by Elizabeth Johnson. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dated 8/18/18 granting plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint is dismissed and plaintiff is granted 20 days leave from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 269 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/18/2018 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiff's prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elizabeth Johnson. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Elizabeth Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
