Hester-Bey v. Intercon Security Co. et al
Plaintiff: David Hester-Bey
Defendant: Intercon Security Co. and Five John Doe
Case Number: 1:2018cv04849
Filed: August 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Brian M Cogan
2 Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. (Guzzi, Roseann)
September 7, 2018 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dated 9/6/18 that the complaint is dismissed; that leave to amend is denied; that pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 9/6/2018 ) c/m w/appeals pkg. (Guzzi, Roseann) (Main Document 5 replaced on 9/7/2018) (Guzzi, Roseann).
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/6/18 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Leave to amend is denied as futile. See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/6/2018 ) c/m *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)
September 5, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of consent to Magistrate Judge signed by David Heaster-Bey ONLY. dated 9/5/18. (Guzzi, Roseann)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan for all further proceedings. Judge Jack B. Weinstein no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/31/2018. (Williams, Erica)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jack B. Weinstein for all further proceedings. Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/29/2018. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 27, 2018 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 24, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Hester-Bey. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Five John Doe, Intercon Security Co., filed by David Hester-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hester-Bey v. Intercon Security Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intercon Security Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Five John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Hester-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?