Veeraswamy v. Veeraswamy
Karen Veeraswamy |
Velappan Veeraswamy |
1:2018cv04860 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Dismiss. The appellee argues that the appellant failed to file the Designation of the Record on Appeal and Statement of Issues by August 30, 2018. However, the Bankruptcy Court record in 1-18-42030-CEC reflects that the Appellant timely filed a Designation of the Record on Appeal and Statement of Issues on August 30, 2018. (See ECF No. #3 at 7-8.) Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 10/12/2018. (Tuminelli, Amanda) |
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The amended briefing schedule is as follows: the appellant's brief is due by November 19, 2018, the appellee's brief is due by December 19, 2018, and the appellant's reply, if any, is due by January 2, 2019. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 10/12/2018. (Tuminelli, Amanda) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief by Velappan Veeraswamy. (Bronson, H.) |
Filing 3 Notice of Bankruptcy Record Received. Notice to all parties, in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), that the record has been received or is available electronically. Parties shall now follow briefing schedule as set forth in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8018. Specifically, appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 days of this notice, the appellee must serve and file a brief within 30 days after service of the appellants brief, and the appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the appellees brief, but a reply brief must be filed at least 7 days before scheduled argument. (Attachments: #1 Trans of Add Rec on Appeal (BK, #2 Trans of Add Rec on Appeal (BK: Notice Recipients) (Brown, Marc) |
Filing 2 Letter MOTION to Dismiss by Karen Veeraswamy. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 1-18-42030., filed by Velappan Veeraswamy. (Attachments: #1 54-Transmittal of Notice of Appeal, #2 Order on Motion to Convert Case Chapter 13 to 7, #3 Notice to Parties BK) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Notice that appeal from the Bankruptcy Court has been docketed. Parties shall file with the Bankruptcy Clerk their designations of items to be included in the record and statement of issues to be presented pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Veeraswamy v. Veeraswamy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: Karen Veeraswamy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: Velappan Veeraswamy | |
Represented By: | H. Bruce Bronson, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.