Bow & Drape, Inc. v. Truly Commerce Inc. et al
| Bow & Drape, Inc. |
| Truly Commerce Inc. and Day to Day Imports Inc. |
| 1:2018cv05066 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Nina Gershon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Nina Gershon: Case called. Gregory Lahr, Esq. for the plaintiff, Bow & Drape. Baruch Gottesman, Esq. for the defendant, Day to Day Imports, Inc., and no appearance for defendant, Truly Commerce, Inc. Pre motion conference held. By November 8, 2018 (2 weeks), the parties will report to the Court on whether they agree to remain in this District. Otherwise, they shall submit to the Court an agreed upon briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to remand and defendant's cross motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California. Discovery is stayed. (Court Reporter Linda Marino x2484.) (Joe, Victor) |
| Filing 9 Letter in Response to Plaintiff's Letter (Docket #8) by Day to Day Imports Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent by Co-Defendant) (Gottesman, Baruch) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Pre motion conference scheduled for 10/18 is adjourned 10/24/2018 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 6D South before Judge Nina Gershon. (Joe, Victor) |
| Filing 8 Letter to Hon. Nina Gershon by Bow & Drape, Inc. (Lahr, J.) |
Filing 7
ORDER deeming #6 Letter filed by Bow & Drape, Inc. to be a request for a pre-motion conference. A conference is hereby scheduled for 10/18/2018 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 6D South. As described in Section 3A of my Individual Motion Practices, plaintiff is directed to file a letter setting forth the basis of its anticipated motion by 9/21/2018, and defendants are directed to respond to the letter by 9/28/2018. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 9/13/2018. (Barrett, C)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Motion to Remand and Briefing Schedule by Bow & Drape, Inc. (Lahr, J.) Modified on 9/14/2018 (Barrett, C). |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Answer to Complaint,, by Day to Day Imports Inc. (Gottesman, Baruch) |
| Case assigned to Judge Nina Gershon and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| ***NOTICE ***- the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to forward a completed Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions in *** NY-E DIVISION OF BUSINESS RULE 50.1(d)(2) and CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY *** section on the second page. This document can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Answer to Complaint,, by Day to Day Imports Inc. (Gottesman, Baruch) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ANSWER to Complaint by Day to Day Imports Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint filed in State Action, #2 Exhibit Notice of Motion for Default filed in the State Action, #3 Exhibit Exhibits to the Notice of Motion (filed in State Court), #4 Exhibit Request for Judicial Intervention (filed in State Action), #5 Exhibit Affidavit by Defendant in Support of Removal, #6 Exhibit Copy of recent decision referred to in Notice of Removal (not yet published), #7 Exhibit Copy of unpublished decision referred to in Notice of Removal, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gottesman, Baruch) |
| NOTICE - the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to forward a completed Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions in *** NY-E DIVISION OF BUSINESS RULE 50.1(d)(2) and CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY *** section on the second page. This document can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 0207-10712791 (Gottesman, Baruch) |
| The case of Bow & Drape, Inc. v. Truly Commerce Inc. et al, has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. The case number is 18cv5066. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
