Shou et al v. Zhou et al
Yuan Chai, Yanyan Song, jiayan shou and xiaoxiang chen |
NYC Metro Regional Center, LLC, Raymond Ku, NYC Fund, L.P. and Joe Zhenghong Zhou |
1:2018cv05144 |
September 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Frederic Block |
Steven Tiscione |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
STATUS REPORT ORDER: The time for Defendants to answer has expired. There has been no response or appearance by Defendants and no further correspondence from the Plaintiffs. Accordingly, counsel for Plaintiffs shall electronically file no later than November 16, 2018, a report on the status of how Plaintiffs intend to proceed with this case. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 11/7/2018. (Vasquez, Lea) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jiayan Shou, Yuan Chai, Yanyan Song, Xiaoxiang Chen. Raymond Ku served on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018; NYC Fund, L.P. served on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018; NYC Metro Regional Center, LLC served on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018; Joe Zhenghong Zhou served on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Joe Zhenghong Zhou, #2 Affidavit of Service NYC Fund, L.P., #3 Affidavit of Service NYC Metro Regional Center, LLC, #4 Affidavit of Service Raymond Ku) (Geiger, Theodore) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10722898 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by jiayan shou, Yuan Chai, Yanyan Song, xiaoxiang chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Exhibit Private Placement Memorandum, #7 Exhibit NYC Metro Regional Center v. Royal One Real Estate Complaint, #8 Exhibit Architect's Report, #9 Exhibit Architect's Report, #10 Exhibit Marketing Materials) (Geiger, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.