Taylor v. City of New York et al
Justin Taylor |
NYPD Officer Ronald Remo, NYPD Officer Darnell Forrester, City of New York and NYPD Sergeant Miguel Figueroa |
1:2018cv05413 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Nicholas G Garaufis |
Roanne L Mann |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin R Reeves on behalf of Justin Taylor (aty to be noticed) (Reeves, Colin) |
Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by City of New York. (Reilly, Kathleen) |
ORDER #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. Without objection, the Court grants the requested extension, until December 26, 2018. Counsel are directed to promptly arrange for the execution and processing of the referenced releases. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann on 10/24/2018. (Kelson, Lise) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Deborah Reilly on behalf of City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Reilly, Kathleen) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Justin Taylor. Ronald Remo served on 10/10/2018, answer due 10/31/2018. (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Justin Taylor. City of New York served on 10/5/2018, answer due 10/26/2018. (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Justin Taylor. Miguel Figueroa served on 10/5/2018, answer due 10/26/2018. (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to City of New York, Miguel Figueroa, Darnell Forrester, Ronald Remo. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon, #3 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Justin Taylor (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Justin Taylor (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York, Miguel Figueroa, Darnell Forrester, Ronald Remo filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10757170 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Justin Taylor. (Moskovitz, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.