Kathy Wu v. Royal Wine Corporation
Kathy Wu |
Royal Wine Corporation (NY) and Royal Wine Corporation |
1:2018cv05608 |
October 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Edward R Korman |
Cheryl L Pollak |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 1/9/2019 @ 12:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/13/2018. (Caggiano, Diana) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due 12/7/2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/13/2018. (Caggiano, Diana) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Royal Wine Corporation. (Benson, Ryan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan T. Benson on behalf of Royal Wine Corporation (notification declined or already on case) (Benson, Ryan) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-10921029. by Royal Wine Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order) (Benson, Ryan) |
ORDER granting #6 : Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF; registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/8/2018. (Zisa, Marie) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kathy Wu. Royal Wine Corporation served on 10/22/2018, answer due 11/12/2018. (Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Royal Wine Corporation. (Williams, Erica) |
Case Assigned to Judge Edward R. Korman and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Wine Corporation (NY) filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10786734 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Kathy Wu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Marks, Bradly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.