Faust v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC
| Cathy Faust |
| Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC and Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC doing business as Account Resolution Services |
| 1:2018cv05659 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC., to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended nunc pro tunc to December 14, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/21/2018. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Cathy Faust. (Barshay, David) |
|
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE ON MOTION: Plaintiff is directed to file by November 26, 2018 a response to defendant's #8 motion for extension of time to file an answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/20/2018. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC. (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Sanders on behalf of Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cathy Faust. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC served on 10/26/2018, answer due 11/16/2018. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Cathy Faust (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10809842 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Cathy Faust. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
