Mitchell-Douyon v. Fresenius Medical Care N.A. et al
| LINDA N MITCHELL-DOUYON |
| SHIEL HOLDINGS, LLC and FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE N.A. |
| 1:2018cv05682 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| I Leo Glasser |
| James Orenstein |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(a), I order the parties to appear for an initial discovery planning conference on, January 9, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11D South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. No later than January 7, 2019, the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF (Electronic Case Filing) system, a joint proposed discovery plan. Each party's counsel must be personally prepared to discuss all factual and legal issues in the case, including the possibility of settlement; otherwise, the client must attend in person as well. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 12/6/2018. (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGAA for Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC. (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC. (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Damian Raphael Cavaleri on behalf of Shiel Holdings, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Cavaleri, Damian) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Noel Angel on behalf of Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Angel, Allison) |
|
ORDER re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer -- If the movant intends to serve as counsel of record for a party, she must promptly file a notice of appearance on its behalf. In the absence of such an appearance, the movant's request again violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and cannot be granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 11/14/2018. (Roantree, Bronwyn)
|
|
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer -- The application is granted on consent; the defendant Shiel Holdings, LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by November 30, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 11/14/2018. (Roantree, Bronwyn)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC. (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Fresenius Medical Care N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Answer) (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Noel Angel on behalf of Fresenius Medical Care N.A. (aty to be noticed) (Angel, Allison) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Damian Raphael Cavaleri on behalf of Fresenius Medical Care N.A. (aty to be noticed) (Cavaleri, Damian) |
|
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer -- The motion is granted on consent as to defendant Fresenius Medical Care, N.A. As to defendant Shiel Holdings, LLC, whom the movant does not represent, I deny the motion without prejudice to renewal by the defendant acting through counsel of record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 11/8/2018. (Roantree, Bronwyn)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Fresenius Medical Care N.A., Shiel Holdings, LLC. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge I. Leo Glasser and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by LINDA N MITCHELL-DOUYON (Crawford, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by LINDA N MITCHELL-DOUYON (Crawford, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number NYEDC-10817464 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by LINDA N MITCHELL-DOUYON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Crawford, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
