Zuska v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc. et al
Inez Zuska |
Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Reads Moving Systems of Carolina, Inc. and Lionell Desmond Greene |
1:2018cv05721 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Cheryl L Pollak |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ENTRY for Initial Conference proceeding held before MJ Pollak on 11/82018. Appearance for Plaintiff: Alexander Karasik. Appearance for Defendant: Christopher Francis Lyon. Defendant to obtain medical records. Settlement Conference set for 1/10/2019 @ 2:30 PM. Clients to be available by phone. (Caggiano, Diana) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 11/8/2018 @ 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/18/2018. (Caggiano, Diana) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice (Other), #1 Notice of Removal,, by Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Lionell Desmond Greene, Reads Moving Systems of Carolina, Inc. (Lyon, Christopher) |
NOTICE :The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without an updated and completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to utilize the Civil Cover Sheet on our website and forward a completed (2 Page Form)Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions ***INCLUDING THE CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY section on the second page***. Please use the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Lionell Desmond Greene, Reads Moving Systems of Carolina, Inc. from Supreme Court of New York Kings County, case number 510808/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-10830509) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Affidavits of Service upon Atlas and Reads, #4 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Service upon Greene, #5 Exhibit D - Defendants Demand for Specific Ad Damnum, #6 Exhibit E - Plaintiff Response to Demand for Specific Ad Damnum, #7 Exhibit F - Defendants Verified Answer) (Lyon, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.