Chhabra et al v. Pompeo et al
| Vijay Chhabra, Ranjna Chhabra and Dr. Vijay Chhabra |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of DHS Kirstien Nielsen, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and Director of USCIS L. Francis Cissna |
| 1:2018cv05851 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| I Leo Glasser |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vijay Chhabra, Ranjna Chhabra. L. Francis Cissna served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018; Kirstien Nielsen served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018; Mike Pompeo served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018; United States Citizenship & Immigration Services served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018; United States Department of Homeland Security served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018; United States Department of State served on 10/31/2018, answer due 12/31/2018. (Moseley, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alex Scott Weinberg on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Weinberg, Alex) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to L. Francis Cissna, Kirstien Nielsen, Mike Pompeo, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge I. Leo Glasser. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Vijay Chhabra, Ranjna Chhabra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| The case of Chhabra et al v. Pompeo et al, has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. The case number is 18cv5851. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10857165 (Moseley, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
