Wylaz v. Laquila Group Equipment Corp.et al
| Wladyslaw Wylaz |
| Joe Doe, Dino Tomasetti, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Irena Doe, Laquila Group Equipment Corp., Laquila Group, Inc. and Dino Tomassetti |
| 1:2018cv05886 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Robert M Levy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/7/2019 10:15 AM in Courtroom 11B South before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 12/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 Initial Conference Questionnaire, #2 Individual Rules) (Marino, Janine)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to all Defendants.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 12/12/2018. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Stipulation So Ordered) by Laquila Group Equipment Corp., Laquila Group, Inc., Dino Tomassetti. (Jakowsky, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Irena Doe, Joe Doe, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Laquila Group Equipment Corp., Laquila Group, Inc., Dino Tomassetti. (Attachments: #1 Laquila Group, Inc. Summons, #2 Dino Tomassetti Jr. Summons, #3 John Doe Summons, #4 Irena Doe Summons, #5 John Does 1-10 Summons, #6 Jane Does 1-10 Summons) (Piper, Francine) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Wladyslaw Wylaz (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons) (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Wladyslaw Wylaz (Marzec, Darius) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Irena Doe, Joe Doe, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Laquila Group Equipment Corp., Laquila Group, Inc., Dino Tomasetti filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10859721 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Wladyslaw Wylaz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Marzec, Darius) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
