Mendez v. NYC Department of Education
| Carmen L. Mendez |
| NYC Department of Education |
| 1:2018cv05894 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carmen L. Mendez. NYC Department of Education served on 12/13/2018, answer due 1/3/2019. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 5 FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 4653135060 filed y Carmen L. Mendez. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to NYC Department of Education. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 4
ORDER, denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Should plaintiff wish to proceed with this lawsuit, she may pay the filing fee of $400 to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of New York within 14 days from the date of this order. If plaintiff fails to submit the filing fee within thetime allowed, or to present credible evidence of indigency, the action shall be dismissed without prejudice. Should the plaintiff timely submit the filing fee, the court will then determine whether the plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded facts establishing the court's jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at her address of record and to note service on the docket by Thursday, December 6, 2018. (Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/4/2018) C/M (Galeano, Sonia)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carmen L. Mendez. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NYC Department of Education, filed by Carmen L. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendez v. NYC Department of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NYC Department of Education | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carmen L. Mendez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
