Fernandez v. Brewer et al
| JOEL FERNANDEZ |
| HENRID E BREWER, VOLPE DEDICATED, INC., Volpe Dedicated Inc. and Henrid E. Brewer |
| 1:2018cv06388 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MINUTE ENTRY for Initial Conference held before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 12/14/2018. Appearance for plaintiff: Albert K Kim. Appearance for defendant: John Dematteo, III. Initial disclosures due 2/28/2019. Document requests and interrogatories due 3/15/2019. Responses due 4/15/2019. Status Conference set for 4/23/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. (Zisa, Marie) |
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Joel Fernandez (Kim, Albert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Albert K Kim on behalf of Joel Fernandez (aty to be noticed) (Kim, Albert) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 12/14/2018 @ 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/13/2018. (Caggiano, Diana)
|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, by HENRID E BREWER, VOLPE DEDICATED, INC. (Dematteo, John) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HENRID E BREWER, VOLPE DEDICATED, INC. identifying Corporate Parent Volpe Dedicated, Inc. for VOLPE DEDICATED, INC.. (Dematteo, John) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HENRID E BREWER, VOLPE DEDICATED, INC. identifying Corporate Parent Volpe Dedicated, Inc. for VOLPE DEDICATED, INC.. (Dematteo, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HENRID E BREWER, VOLPE DEDICATED, INC. from Supreme Court, Kings County, case number 510603/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-10924755) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Verified Bill of Particulars, #4 Exhibit D - Response to Demand for Ad Damnum) (Dematteo, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
