Ng v. Berryhill
| Amanda Ng |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 1:2018cv06999 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Court grants the Commissioner's request for an extension, but amends the briefing schedule as follows: the administrative record shall be filed on or before March 18, 2019; plaintiff's motion shall be served on or before April 18, 2019; Commissioner's cross-motion shall be served on or before May 20, 2019; plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be served on or before May 27, 2019; and Commissioner's reply, if any, shall be served on or before June 3, 2019. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 1/11/2019. (Beeney, Eliza)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File administrative record and respectfully requesting approval of the proposed amended briefing schedule by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Appleton, Candace) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Candace Scott Appleton on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (aty to be noticed) (Appleton, Candace) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 12/17/2018 Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff is granted #3 leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the Summons, this Order and Plaintiff's Complaint upon the Defendant, without prepayment of fees. Defendant shall proceed promptly to obtain the administrative record of the proceedings below, and shall file the record by the date set forth below, unless an extension is granted by order of the Court for good cause. Defendant shall file the administrative record, which will constitute Defendant's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint on or before 1/17/2019. Plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and administrative record, by 2/18/2019. Defendant shall file and serve a response to Plaintiffs motion, and any cross-motion, by 3/4/2019; Plaintiff shall file and serve its reply, if any, by 3/18/2019; and Defendant shall file and serve a reply, if any, by 4/1/2019. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 12/17/2018. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amanda Ng. (Leipziger, Amy) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Amanda Ng (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Leipziger, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amanda Ng Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Amanda Ng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Leipziger, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ng v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Ng | |
| Represented By: | Amy L Leipziger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Candace Scott Appleton |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
