Murrell v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Malika Murrell
Defendant: Jamie Hanlon, Nancy A. Berryhill, Kiara Jackson, Emilio Justiniano and Thomas Galo
Case Number: 1:2018cv07284
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: William F Kuntz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's Orders and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's #1 application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 was granted on 12/21/2018, 2018. The United States Marshals Service ("USMS") is directed to serve the summons and amended complaint upon the Social Security Administration without prepayment of fees. The parties shall advise the Court by signing the enclosed form whether they jointly consent to trial and decision on this case by me, a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Although plaintiff names several individuals as defendants, there is no individual liability under Title VII. Accordingly, the USMS is directed to serve the Social Security Administration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Service of the summons and amended complaint shall be made upon the Social Security Administration, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(l)-(2). SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 1/4/2019. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, #2 Consent to Magistrate Judge Trial. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
December 21, 2018 Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
December 21, 2018 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:18-cv-09912. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 12/21/2018. (Kuntz, William)
December 13, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order, to Malika Murrell 131-37 Mathewson Cl Jamaica, NY 11434. (aea) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
December 12, 2018 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York (tro) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/12/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
December 12, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
November 15, 2018 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT; re: amending #2 Complaint against Nancy A. Berryhill, Thomas Galo, Jamie Hanlon, Kiara Jackson, Emilio Justiniano with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Malika Murrell. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
October 25, 2018 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis see document #1 by Malika Murrell. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 25, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. Document filed by Malika Murrell.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
October 25, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Malika Murrell.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]
October 25, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/21/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murrell v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malika Murrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamie Hanlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kiara Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emilio Justiniano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Galo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?