Heriveaux v. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Magaly E. Heriveaux |
| Department of Homeland Security and Secretary of Homeland Security |
| 1:2018mc01853 |
| July 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: In line with the foregoing, Heriveaux's motion for leave to file a new complaint as proposed is denied. Her motion to proceed IFP is denied as moot. The Court's January 15, 2016 order, prohibiting Heriveaux from filing any further actions in this district unless she either (1) provides pre-payment of the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1914, or (2) first obtains judicial permission for her proposed filing and otherwise meets the standards for IFP st atus, remains in full force and effect.Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prohibit Heriveaux from filing an appeal. Nevertheless, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any such appeal from this Order would not b e taken in good faith, and, therefore, IFP status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to close this docket for administrative purposes. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/8/2018. (Siegel, Max)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
