Islam v. Whitaker et al
| Josy Islam |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Thomas Cioppa, Barbara Velarde, Kirstjen Nielsen, Matthew Whitaker and Lee Cissna |
| 1:2019cv00161 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. Barbara Velarde served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. Kirstjen Nielsen served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. Lee Cissna served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. Thomas Cioppa served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josy Islam. Matthew Whitaker served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean P. Greene on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Greene, Sean) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION #2 for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically APPROVED by Clerk of Court on 1/10/2019. (Marziliano, August) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Josy Islam. (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT JOSY ISLAM against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11088589 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES, filed by Josy Islam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibits to Complaint) (Pu-Folkes, Bryan) Modified: Civil Cover Sheet has been replaced.(Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
