Dorfman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Josef Dorfman |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
| 1:2019cv00475 |
| January 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The motion to withdraw #6 is granted. Attorney Daniel Harris Kohn is hereby terminated from the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/6/2019. (Murphy, Colleen)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Boris Brownstein on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Brownstein, Boris) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Dov Michael Mittelman on behalf of Josef Dorfman (aty to be noticed) (Mittelman, Dov) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Klein, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Klein, Jonathan) |
|
ORDER: New counsel from Stein Saks PLLC must enter a notice of appearance before the motion to withdraw #6 can be granted. Otherwise, the Court must hold a hearing on the motion to withdraw. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 2/14/2019. (Murphy, Colleen)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Request to Withdraw as Counsel per LR 1.4. by Josef Dorfman (Kohn, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josef Dorfman. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 2/1/2019, answer due 2/22/2019. (Kohn, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Capital summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11132342 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Josef Dorfman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Capital One, #3 Proposed Summons Equifx) (Kohn, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
