Gilberti v. Amistad Management Corporation et al
Troy Gilberti |
Scott Lucas, Bob Lucas, Amistad Management Corporation and Robert Lucas |
1:2019cv00668 |
July 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Roslynn R Mauskopf |
Vera M Scanlon |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Troy Gilberti. Robert Lucas served on 9/23/2019, answer due 10/14/2019. (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Troy Gilberti. Amistad Management Corporation served on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Amistad Management Corporation. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Robert Lucas. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 13 Proposed Summons. Re #10 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint by Troy Gilberti (Wade, Locksley) |
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement. Defendant Scott Lucas is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket sheet and case caption accordingly. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/3/2019. (Taronji, Robert) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement #1 Complaint Caption and Dismiss Defendant Scott Lucas by Troy Gilberti. (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons. Re #10 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint by Troy Gilberti (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amistad Management Corporation, Robert Lucas, filed by Troy Gilberti. (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Locksley O. Wade on behalf of Troy Gilberti (aty to be noticed) (Wade, Locksley) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Troy Gilberti. Scott Lucas served on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/5/2019. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Troy Gilberti as to Bob Lucas. (See Remarks noted on USMS Form 285) (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Troy Gilberti as to Amistad Management Corporation. (See Remarks noted on USMS Form 285) (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Amistad Management Corporation; Bob Lucas; and Scott Lucas. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk's Office is requested to issue the summons. C/M to pro se Plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 8/9/2019. (Quinlan, Krista) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Troy Gilberti. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Troy Gilberti. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.