Brown v. Williams
| Shaquan Brown |
| Warden O.B.C.C. F. Williams |
| 1:2019cv00750 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaquan Brown. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. On February 4, 2019, the pro se petitioner, Shaquan Brown, filed this habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 challenging his pending state criminal proceeding. By letter dated February 6, 2019, the petitioner was provided with the proper forms and instructedthat in order to proceed, he must either pay the $5 filing fee or return the completed IFP application. More than 14 days have elapsed and the Court has not received a response from the petitioner. However, given the petitioner's pro se status, the Court grants him additional time to comply with the Court's filing requirements. The Clerk of Court should include a request to proceed informa pauperis with this Order. If the petitioner fails to comply with this Order within 30 days, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. No extension shall be granted without good cause. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 2/26/2019. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (Documents mailed to pro se party on 2/7/19). (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Shaquan Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden O.B.C.C. F. Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Shaquan Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
