Bryan v. Fagor America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Asha Bryan
Defendant: Fagor America, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01027
Filed: February 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: William F Kuntz
Referring Judge: Robert M Levy
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2019 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 21, 2019 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 21, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE by Fagor America, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FILED Notice of Removal EDNY without exhibits) (Gerstman, Barry) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/21/2019) (Bowens, Priscilla).
February 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Fagor America, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, case number 516264/2018E. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11218384) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - S&C dated August 9, 2018, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - AOS from S&C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - Fagor's Notice of Removal 9.28.18, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Verified Answer to Verified Complaint 10.5.18, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E - Order to Show Cause 10.10.18, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F - Declaration in Opposition to Motion to Remand 10.17.18, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G - Order on Remand 10.19.18, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H - E-mail from plaintiff's counsel) (Gerstman, Barry)
February 21, 2019 Case assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan v. Fagor America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fagor America, Inc.
Represented By: Barry L. Gerstman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asha Bryan
Represented By: Matthew J Salimbene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?