Tong v. Whitaker et al
| Chuang Tong |
| Matthew Whitaker, Gregory A. Richardson, Kirstjen Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna |
| 1:2019cv01249 |
| March 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that this action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. Signed by Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
ORDER electronically endorsing #7 . The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. So Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/24/2019. (Carosella, Christy)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice for the Court's endorsement by L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Gregory A. Richardson, Matthew Whitaker (Greene, Sean) |
|
ORDER TO ANSWER re #6 Letter filed by L. Francis Cissna, Gregory A. Richardson, Matthew Whitaker, Kirstjen Nielsen -- The request is granted. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by August 20, 2019. So Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/15/2019. (Carosella, Christy)
|
| Filing 6 Letter respectfully requesting an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint until August 20, 2019 by L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Gregory A. Richardson, Matthew Whitaker (Greene, Sean) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean P. Greene on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Greene, Sean) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number BNYEDC-11249038 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Chuang Tong. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C) (Francis, Clement) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
