Yi v. Barr et al
Yong Sun Yi |
Attorney General William P. Barr and Acting Director, BOP Hugh J. Hurwitz |
1:2019cv01682 |
March 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Nicholas G Garaufis |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER, In accordance with Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure plaintiff hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/17/2019. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis: Pre-Motion Conference held on 4/16/2019. Counsel for both parties present. Plaintiff's counsel informed the court that Plaintiff planned to dismiss the case. (Court Reporter Linda Marino) (Davis, Eleanor) Modified conference date on 4/22/2019 (Lee, Tiffeny). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Yong Sun Yi (Moseley, Thomas) |
Filing 8 Letter Informing the Court of Defendants' Intention to File a Motion to Dismiss, or, alternatively, a Motion for Summary Judgment by William P. Barr, Hugh J. Hurwitz (Smith, Sheldon) |
ORDER re: Plaintiff's #6 Application for a Pre-Motion Conference: The Application is GRANTED. The parties are directed to confer and contact the court's Deputy at 718-613-2545 to schedule the pre-motion conference. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/8/2019. (Davis, Eleanor) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sheldon A. Smith on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Smith, Sheldon) |
Filing 6 Letter pre-motion conference request by Yong Sun Yi (Moseley, Thomas) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yong Sun Yi. William P. Barr served on 3/28/2019, answer due 5/27/2019; Hugh J. Hurwitz served on 3/28/2019, answer due 5/27/2019. (Moseley, Thomas) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to William P. Barr, Hugh J. Hurwitz, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yong Sun Yi filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11317097 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Yong Sun Yi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Moseley, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.