Richardson v. Quay et al
Plaintiff: Rasheen Richardson
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Herman Quay
Case Number: 1:2019cv01747
Filed: March 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Steven M Gold
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: The plaintiff in the above-referenced case is incarcerated and proceeding pro se. Accordingly, a telephone conference will be held at 3:00 p.m. on August 15, 2019 before the undersigned, at (718) 613-2560. All counsel/parties must be available for the telephone conference. Defendants' counsel is directed to immediately contact the appropriate officials at the correctional facility to arrange for plaintiffs participation in this telephone conference at the above date and time. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Chamber's Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia) Modified SCHEDULING ORDER TEXT AND TYPE OF CONFERENCE on 6/21/2019 (Gillespie, Saudia). (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/21/2019) (Gillespie, Saudia).
June 21, 2019 Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Move with Respect to the Complaint by Federal Bureau of Prisons, Herman Quay. (Greene, Sean)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER: Granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons and Herman Quay shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 25, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/21/2019. (Gillespie, Saudia)
June 14, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed on behalf of pro se Rasheen Richardson. Warden Herman Quay served on 6/11/2019, answer due 8/12/2019. (See 2nd page.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
May 14, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rasheen Richardson. Federal Bureau of Prisons served on 5/10/2019, answer due 7/9/2019. (See Remarks noted on USMS Form 285) (Galeano, Sonia)
April 17, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Warden Herman Quay; and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. (Courtesy Copies shall be served upon the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York; the Attorney General of the United States in Washington D.C.; and the Agency.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on March 20, 2019. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 is hereby granted. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons and complaint upon the defendant without prepayment of fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 4/16/2019. (Farmer, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiff s prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). (Williams, Erica)
March 29, 2019 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica)
March 27, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (Williams, Erica)
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rasheen Richardson. (Williams, Erica)
March 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Prisons, Herman Quay Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Rasheen Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Quay et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rasheen Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Represented By: Sean P. Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Herman Quay
Represented By: Sean P. Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?