Quinde Villa v. BK General Construction LLC et al
Efrain Gustavo Quinde Villa |
Diego Ochoa, BK General Construction LLC, B.K. Construction Group Inc., Magdalena Victoria, BK General Construction LLC doing business as BK Construction and B.K. Construction Group Inc. doing business as BK Construction |
1:2019cv01824 |
March 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Robert M Levy |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Efrain Gustavo Quinde Villa. BK General Construction LLC served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Efrain Gustavo Quinde Villa. B.K. Construction Group Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. (Faillace, Michael) |
ORDER: The Court notes that Plaintiff, who filed his complaint on March 29, 2019, has failed to effectuate service as of July 9, 2019. Plaintiff has until July 17, 2019 to effectuate service or show good cause as to why service has not yet been effectuated. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/10/2019. (Brodziak, Maya) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse S. Barton on behalf of Efrain Gustavo Quinde Villa (aty to be noticed) (Barton, Jesse) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to B.K. Construction Group Inc., BK General Construction LLC, Diego Ochoa, Magdalena Victoria. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon, #3 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B.K. Construction Group Inc., BK General Construction LLC, Diego Ochoa, Magdalena Victoria filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11335783 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Efrain Gustavo Quinde Villa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons BK General Construction LLC, #3 Proposed Summons B.K. Construction Group Inc., #4 Proposed Summons Magdalena Victoria, #5 Proposed Summons Diego Ochoa) (Faillace, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.