Garfield v. Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.
| Robert Garfield |
| Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01985 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Securities/Commodities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Robert Garfield (Klein, Michael) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Adjourn Conference of May 23, 2019, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Robert Garfield. (Klein, Michael) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court having been advised that this matter has settled, the case is dismissed, subject to reinstatement at the request of any party within 30 days. The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed within this period. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/15/2019. (Cogan, Brian)
|
|
ORDER. Because the parties did not file a Rule 41 notice by 5/11/2019, this case is going forward. The initial status conference previously set for 5/23/2019 will proceed as scheduled. The parties are reminded to comply with the mandatory requirements for the conference set forth at #5 . Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/14/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
ORDER granting in part #9 motion for an extension of time to answer. If the parties do not reach a settlement by 5/11/2019, defendant's answer is due 5/17/2019. If the case goes forward, a scheduling order will be docketed separately setting an initial status conference in this case which will be promptly after the answer. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/29/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Stipulation and Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to the Complaint) (Rieder, Eric) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw #6 Unsigned Order to Show Cause by Robert Garfield. (Klein, Michael) |
|
ORDER granting #8 . Plaintiff shall file a status report or Rule 41 notice prior to 5/11/2019. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/11/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Garfield. Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. served on 4/9/2019, answer due 4/30/2019. (Klein, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Unsigned Order to Show Cause by Robert Garfield (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2) (Klein, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 5/23/2019 at 4:30 PM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/10/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11358919 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Robert Garfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Klein, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garfield v. Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Garfield | |
| Represented By: | Michael Jason Klein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Rieder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
