Perl v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et al
| Israel Perl |
| Ronald Forster, Forster & Garbus, LLP and Mark A. Garbus |
| 1:2019cv02068 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Letter In Response to Defendants Second Application for Pre-Motion Conference by Israel Perl (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION to Compel the Plaintiff and his attorney to appear for pre-motion conference by Forster & Garbus, LLP. (Arleo, Robert) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference filed by Israel Perl. (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Israel Perl (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Forster & Garbus, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Arleo, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Arleo on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Arleo, Robert) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE: See entry #9 . Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 4/17/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The court accepts plaintiff's counsel's representation that the duplicate action was filed based on a mistake. The request for a pre-motion conference is therefore denied. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 4/17/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ronald Forster, Forster & Garbus, LLP, Mark A. Garbus. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. Additionally, case is reassigned to Office Code 1: Brooklyn as per civil cover sheet Rule 50.1(d)(2). (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Ronald Forster, Forster & Garbus, LLP, Mark A. Garbus filing fee $400, receipt number ANYEDC-11368804, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by Israel Perl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Collection Letter) (Pashkin, Mitchell) Modified on 4/10/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Israel Perl (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Israel Perl (Pashkin, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
