Ragnauth v. Coast Professional Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Amit Ragnauth
Defendant: John Does 1-25 and Coast Professional Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv02693
Filed: May 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Referring Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin J. Wolf on behalf of Amit Ragnauth (aty to be noticed) (Wolf, Benjamin)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel C Cohen on behalf of Amit Ragnauth (aty to be noticed) (Cohen, Daniel)
May 14, 2019 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Amit Ragnauth. Coast Professional Inc. waiver sent on 5/14/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Jones, Joseph)
May 10, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Coast Professional Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 10, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
May 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT was filed against Coast Professional Inc., John Does 1-25 filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11457467 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Amit Ragnauth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Jones, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ragnauth v. Coast Professional Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coast Professional Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amit Ragnauth
Represented By: Joseph Karl Jones
Represented By: Benjamin J. Wolf
Represented By: Daniel C Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?