Barker v. Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC
Ronald Barker |
Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC |
1:2019cv02710 |
May 8, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Steven M Gold |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, (Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint by Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC. (Fleming, Michael) Modified the type of motion on 6/21/2019 (Gillespie, Saudia). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa C. Rodriguez on behalf of Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC (aty to be noticed) (Rodriguez, Melissa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Friel Fleming on behalf of Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC (aty to be noticed) (Fleming, Michael) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ronald Barker. Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC served on 6/19/2019, answer due 7/10/2019. (Love, Alexis) |
![]() |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC. (Williams, Erica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC, filed by Ronald Barker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2019: #2 Complaint pt.2) (Williams, Erica). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2019: #3 Complaint pt.3) (Williams, Erica). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2019: #4 Complaint pt.4) (Williams, Erica). |
FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 4653139779 (Williams, Erica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Barker v. Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aramark Uniform & Careers Apparel LLC | |
Represented By: | Melissa C. Rodriguez |
Represented By: | Michael Friel Fleming |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald Barker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.