DW Branding, Inc. et al v. International Flynn, LLC et al
| DW BRANDING, INC., COFFEE RX, INC. and GS COFFEE, INC. |
| CONOR FLYNN and INTERNATIONAL FLYNN, LLC |
| 1:2019cv02939 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Check , filed by Conor Flynn, International Flynn, LLC. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held before Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/11/2019. Counsel for plaintiffs present. Defendants' counsel failed to appear despite notice of the conference. Defendants' counsel is therefore sanctioned in the amount of $425, payable to plaintiff's counsel within 7 days of the date of this Order to compensate plaintiff's client for the waste of time, with proof of payment filed on the docket of this case. The initial status conference is adjourned to 7/31/2019 at 11:15 am in Chambers 704S. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 10 Letter (Joint) by Parties Per Mandatory Rqmts. for the Initial Status Conf. by Coffee Rx, Inc., DW Branding, Inc., GS Coffee, Inc. (Etufugh, Alozie) |
ORDER re: #6 . The parties have failed to file a joint letter in advance of the initial status conference consistent with the Court's prior Order. Defendants' cookie-cutter answer generally denying all allegations in the complaint is not useful to the Court: plaintiffs have given a thorough description of their version of events in the complaint, and defendants have not explained their position to the contrary, so the Court has no reason to believe that there is any possible alternate explanation. The purpose of the initial status conference is to isolate the meritorious areas of litigation and streamline an efficient discovery and dispositive motion schedule targeted to those issues. The parties are therefore directed to file a joint letter in compliance with this Court's individual rules by 7/9/2019. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/9/2019. (Clarke, Melonie)
|
| Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Etufugh, Alozie) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Coffee Rx, Inc., DW Branding, Inc., GS Coffee, Inc.. (Etufugh, Alozie) |
|
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The Court does not delay litigation pending settlement discussions as the parties are free to settle at any time. If the parties want to settle before the conference, they can. Otherwise, they can expect to be put on a prompt discovery and trial schedule. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/28/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Conor Flynn, International Flynn, LLC. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 7/11/2019 at 10:30 AM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/31/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. (Mahoney, Brenna) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan for all further proceedings. Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 5/30/2019. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine) (Main Document 5 replaced on 5/20/2019) (Rocco, Christine). |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Conor summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11490354 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by DW BRANDING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Etufugh, Alozie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
