Williams v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Williams
Defendant: New York Court Officer John Doe 1, City of New York, New York Court Officer John Doe 2, New York Court Officer John Doe 3 and New York City Police Officers John Does 4-7
Interested Party: Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and Office of the Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2019cv03045
Filed: May 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The #8 Office of the Attorney General and the Office of the #9 Corporation Counsel separately request an extension of time to respond to the Court's 5/23/2019 Valentin Order. As the first request of an extension of time is generally granted as a courtesy, the requests are granted. The Office of the Attorney General and the Office of the Corporation Counsel shall respond to the Court's 5/23/2019 Valentin Order by 8/21/2019. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 6/24/2019. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
June 21, 2019 Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Corporation Counsel writes this letter to respectfully request an extension of time to respond to the Court's May 23, 2019 Valentin Order. by Corporation Counsel of the City of New York. (Pellegrino, Nicolette)
June 20, 2019 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Valentin Order by Office of the Attorney General. (Ysaguirre, Melissa)
June 7, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicolette Pellegrino on behalf of Corporation Counsel of the City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Pellegrino, Nicolette)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The complaint is dismissed as to the City of New York but shall proceed against the individual officer defendants once they are identified. Pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997), the Court requests that the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and the New York State Attorney General's Office ascertain the full name of the John Doe defendants who were allegedly involved in the events set forth by plaintiff at the Brooklyn Criminal Court on or about January 22, 2018 and September 2018. Corporation Counsel and the Attorney General's Office is to produce the information specified regarding the identity of these defendants within 30 days from the entry of this order. Once this information is provided, plaintiff's complaint will be deemed amended to reflect the full name of the defendants and the Court will direct service of process accordingly. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order and the complaint to the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Special Federal Litigation Division and the New York State Attorney General's Office. No summons will issue at this time. The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Brian M. Cogan, on 5/23/2019. C/mailed. (Party: City of New York - terminated.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
May 22, 2019 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica)
May 22, 2019 Filing 4 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiff's prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). (Williams, Erica)
May 17, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Williams, Erica)
May 17, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeremiah Williams. (Williams, Erica)
May 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York, New York City Police Officers John Does 4-7, New York Court Officer John Doe 1, New York Court Officer John Doe 2, New York Court Officer John Doe 3, filed by Jeremiah Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Court Officer John Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Court Officer John Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Court Officer John Doe 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Police Officers John Does 4-7
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Represented By: Nicolette Pellegrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of the Attorney General
Represented By: Melissa Ellen Ysaguirre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?