Keyes v. Berryhill
| Dominic Keyes |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 1:2019cv03109 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean P. Greene on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (aty to be noticed) (Greene, Sean) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 5/30/2019 Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Defendant shall file the administrative record, which will constitute Defendant's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint by 8/27/2019. Plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings by 10/28/2019. Defendant shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff's motion, which response must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and underlying administrative proceedings, by 12/27/2019. Plaintiff shall file and serve a reply, if any, by 1/17/2020. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/29/2019. (Abdallah, Fida)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dominic Keyes. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Dominic Keyes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keyes v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Sean P. Greene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dominic Keyes | |
| Represented By: | Sally DeLuca |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
