Chowdhury v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
| Nafiz Chowdhury |
| Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03427 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nafiz Chowdhury (Tariq, Subhan) |
ORDER In light of the parties filing a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #7 , the Initial Conference set for 9/5/2019 at 2:00 PM is cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 8/1/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| In light of the #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, this action is terminated. (Brodziak, Maya) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff and a representative of defendant must appear at initial conference in person. No exceptions. Failure to attend in person may result in sanctions. Initial Conference set for 9/5/2019 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., located in the United States Eastern District of New York Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all counsel and clients are aware of their obligation to appear. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Prior to the conference, the parties are to comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (See attached blank document) Case Management Statement must be completed and filed on ECF no later than 8/30/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 7/31/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nafiz Chowdhury. Midland Credit Management, Inc. waiver sent on 6/27/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Tariq, Subhan) |
|
ORDER: The Court notes that though Defendant removed this case on June 10, 2019, it has failed to show that it answered in state court in its removal documents and has also failed to file an answer in the instant case. Because the deadline for Defendant to answer Plaintiff's complaint was, at the latest, June 17, 2019, the Defendant is in default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) ("When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default."). Plaintiff shall move for a certificate of default against the defaulting party by July 24, 2019. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/10/2019. (Brodziak, Maya)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Beth Silverman on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silverman, Ellen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Midland Credit Management, Inc. from Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, case number 013211. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11561069) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Affidavit of Service) (Beh, Han) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chowdhury v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nafiz Chowdhury | |
| Represented By: | Subhan Tariq |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Han Sheng Beh |
| Represented By: | Ellen Beth Silverman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
