Zahra v. Gourmet Grill, Inc. et al
| Lauren Zahra |
| John Disanto, Jack Disanto and Gourmet Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03600 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Gourmet Grill, Inc. (Weiss, Adam) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Weiss, Adam) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEDIATION REFERRAL IN ACTION UNDER FLSA & NYLL: The parties are directed to adhere to the instructions in the attached order. Status Report regarding settlement is due by 9/23/2019. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Selection of Mediator due by 8/12/2019. Mediation shall be completed by 11/7/2019. Status Report on mediation due within 14 days of the completion of mediation. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 7/29/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
|
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Alex Umansky terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 7/16/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Lauren Zahra. (Umansky, Alex) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessenia Maldonado on behalf of Lauren Zahra (aty to be noticed) (Maldonado, Jessenia) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Lauren Zahra. Jack Disanto waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019; John Disanto waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019; Gourmet Grill, Inc. waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (Umansky, Alex) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam C. Weiss on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Weiss, Adam) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Lauren Zahra (Umansky, Alex) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jack Disanto, John Disanto, Gourmet Grill, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11590983 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Lauren Zahra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Umansky, Alex) |
| Case assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
