United States of America v. Approximately Five Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,307.00) et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Forty Dollars and Zero Cents ($135,040.00) and Approximately Five Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,307.00)
Case Number: 1:2019cv03658
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2019 Filing 5 Seizure Warrant Returned Executed. Served on 7/26/19. $5,330.00 and $135,040.00 transferred to Judicial action. (Guzzi, Roseann)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Issuance of Warrant in rem. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/24/2019. See attached for details. (Abdallah, Fida)
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Williams, Erica)
June 24, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by United States of America. (Williams, Erica)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Approximately Five Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,307.00), Approximately One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Forty Dollars and Zero Cents ($135,040.00), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately Five Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,307.00) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Forty Dollars and Zero Cents ($135,040.00)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately Five Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars and Zero Cents ($5,307.00)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Elliot M. Schachner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?